Some Thoughts on Luke 8:1-11

This is a "re-posting" from about a year ago.  Partly to re-boot the blog.  Partly to invite additional conversation on this.  Currently working through some studies on reconciliation/forgiveness with our collegians.  This may be among the most riveting stories of forgiveness in the NT.


"This is the scandal of the gospel: that what in your life is most cursed and hateful, the trash of your soul, can become your greatest instrument for redemption and healing and blessing."  Leonard Sweet,

There she stands, guilty, condemned by her own actions and condemned by an altogether too eager crowd.  I almost imagine her with clothing a bit dishelveled (after all she was "caught in the act" v. 4) and certainly with eyes firmly fixed on the ground.  The evident weight of shame crushing her already wounded spirit. 

There they stand, wild-eyed and breathless.  Rocks already in hand to exact judgment.  Righteous (self-righteous maybe?) rage boiling through their bodies.  They have a question to ask, a question sure to expose the heart of the troubling teacher who has appeared yet again at their temple, "The Law commands us to stone such women.  So what do you say?" (v. 5). 

There He stands, a healer in the presence of desperate wounds.  Pressed for an answer He rises from doodling on the ground, "If you're not guilty too, go ahead, stone her." He then returns to His impromptu dirt drawing.

One by one the stones fall from their hands only to be carried away in their own stony hearts.  The condemning crowd is now nothing more than a memory leaving the guilty woman and the deliberately doodling doctor of souls alone.  I find it fascinating that she stayed and watched Him draw.  Her accusers were nowhere to be found.  She was a free woman, but not really.  Her guilt still bound her and the only remedy was to be found in the man drawing in the dirt.

He stands, looks around, and then looks in her eyes and asks, "Where are they?  Has no one accused you?"  (Oh, they had certainly accused her; all the way to the temple.  Through every street and alley they had accused her.  The sinuous tendrils of the grapevine had reported the sensational news.  She had been accused and would continue to be accused by whispers and pointed fingers for the rest of her days, "She's the one.  I hear they caught her in the act.")  Her only answer is, "No one, Lord."

Let us pause and remember, she is without doubt guilty.  She beyond question deserves punishment.  She, no doubt, expects the worst.  After all, it is what she has earned.  But it is not what she will get.

To her utter astonishment He says, "Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more."  She turns and walks away forgiven.

But what of the man?  She was caught in the act which, unavoidably, means there was a man equally guilty if not equally condemned.  I wonder about their lives from that day forward.  She publicly condemned and permanently branded a "sinner" yet privately and potently forgiven.  He, on the other hand, never facing public scrutiny, but living with the festering ulcer of unacknowledged and unforgiven sin.

Which would you choose;  the public humiliation of having your sin put on display and the life-changing experience of mercy and forgiveness or the temporary satisfaction of looking good while missing the grace of God extended to you?  Far too many of us, like the un-named and unidentified man, choose the latter and great is our loss.

I imagine that guilty woman a few years later walking down those same streets through which she was unceremoniously dragged.  I see her walking into that same part of the temple and running her fingers through that dirt where He drew things.  She has difficulty remembering just what it was that He drew that day, while a passerby whispers behind her back, "I remember the day they brought her here to be stoned."  It brings a smile to her face because she knows that, much like that ephemeral work of art, He no longer calls to mind her sin.  Rising and dusting her hands she hums a joyful tune on her way out, for she is forgiven; far and away among His greatest and most enduring works of art.

Lux et Veritas

Following is a scripted version of the Chapel address I delivered at Judson College on September 20th.  Several have requested copies of these remarks as they apparently generated some on-going conversation on campus.  I can think of no higher praise.  These thoughts are offered here for those who wish to partake. 

The Judson Seal carries the Latin phrase, Lus et Veritas – Light and Truth.  A bit of reflective pondering reveals, surprisingly, that the most critical word therein is the most diminutive and most easily overlooked; the word et.  Et, a vital connector without which Light and Truth are left standing dimly, dangerously, and deceptively alone. 

Let us 1^st affirm there is indeed Light.  The pursuit of Light and the enlightenment it brings is not only valuable, it is vital!  There are things yet unknown which desperately need to be known:  a cure for cancers, how to provide sustainable and clean energy for the world, how to feed the soon-to-be 8 billion people inhabiting our shared planet.  These critical issues, and many others like them, must be addressed by the brightest and best thinking we can produce.  But what difficulties arise from the pursuit of Light without the guidance of Truth? 

I.    Light Without Truth 

1.    Dim 

Light without Truth is, first and foremost, dim, truly an arresting juxtaposition.  To be clear, dim is a shorthand way of saying “dim-witted”.  It is fascinating that the pursuit which should produce sharpness and clarity of thought, when divorced from Truth, produces just the opposite, fuzzy thinking and dimness.  Jesus stated in His Sermon on the Mount “If then the light within you is darkness –how great is that darkness.”  (Mt. 6:23)   This pursuit of Light without the guidance of Truth deepens the darkness rather than illuminating it.

I have followed with great interest the career and thought of, perhaps, the greatest mind living among us in this age.  The fact that this marvelously gifted mind is contained within the body of a man confined to a wheelchair makes his career all the more intriguing.  Stephen F. Hawking is certainly among the greatest minds of our day and quite possibly in all of human history.  I am not intelligent enough to understand all he writes about but I did read his A Briefer History of Time (the “Reader’s Digest” version for folks like me!) and have regularly sought out his publications.  I was humored by the title of one of his latest offerings, The Grand Design.  I found it to be humorous simply because this great mind is talking about a design while simultaneously denying a Designer.  To my, admittedly inferior, mind this seems to be a dim-witted position.  Through the years I have held on to the kernel of wisdom offered to a class of undergraduates by Dr. W.T. Edwards at Samford University: “Boys, keep an open mind.  Just don’t keep it so open that your brains fall out.”  With apologies to Mr. Hawking, it might just be that his brain has fallen out.

2.    Deadly

Though Light without Truth may be dim, producing a frustrating conundrum, it is also deadly, producing all too tangible evidences of its dangers.  Perhaps chief among the tangible evidences of the deadly nature of Light devoid of the guidance of Truth is the horror of the Holocaust during World War II.  Rudolph Hess, who was 3^rd in line of succession to Adolph Hitler, called Nazism “applied biology.”  This horrific application of the Light of biological sciences divorced from the Truth of the dignity of all men resulted in the death of over 6 million Jews, as well as millions of other “inferior” peoples.  6 million is a difficult number to wrap our minds around in a practical way.  Consider that a population greater than the entire population of Alabama was exterminated over a period of just a few years.  All of this done in the name of “applied biology.”  Clearly, our pursuit of Light desperately needs the corrective guidance of Truth.

3.     Deceptive

Perhaps the most startling consequence of the pursuit of Light without the guidance of Truth is that it is deceptive.  Light without Truth says, “It’s all a smorgasbord!  Indulge!”  We live in a culture awash in choices, whether it’s the hundreds of channels available for our surfing pleasure or the ever burgeoning cereal aisle in our grocery stores, we are accustomed to choices and immediate availability of all things we desire.  But this can be a deceptive descent into darkness.

This is most readily observed in our societal obsession with, and celebration of, every expression of sexuality.  A couple of recent top 40 hits, which are shockingly sung by young children everywhere, provide sufficient proof of this “anything goes” obsession.  Take a moment to rationally consider the message of Rhianna’s celebration of Sado-masochism in her hit “S&M” or  of Katy Perry who was not satisfied to “kiss a girl and like it” but decided to recall her exploits “Last Friday Night” complete with maxing out credit cards at the bars, some skinny dipping with a group, a ménage a trois and then wanting to “do it all again.”  Allow me to quote Randal Stoner on this issue:  “Uncontrolled sexual appetite, like physical appetite, can kill.  And it may feel good all the way to the emergency room or the morgue.  It kills…what is ultimately at the heart of the best sex imaginable, trust.” (Randal Stoner, The God Who Smokes)

II.            Truth Without Light

Let us again affirm there is indeed Truth – capital “T” truth.  Truth which applies to all people in all places at all times is also known as “universal Truth” or “absolute Truth.”  I continue to be amazed at the resistance to this notion when we all live with “capital ‘T’ Truth” each and every day.  There just aren’t many sane people walking out of 3^rd story windows due to the universal Truth of gravity.  Likewise, people getting on a jet in New York heading to Los Angeles want their pilot to be ruthlessly absolute in selecting the route.  Or consider the patient in the operating room for heart surgery.  I am completely confident they are counting on their surgeon being anything but “relative” in this moment.  They absolutely want their heart fixed and not their liver invaded.

While affirming that Truth exists we must also recognize that Truth without Light is just as dim, deadly and deceptive, maybe more so, than Light without Truth.  Steven Weisberg, Nobel Prize winner for his work on the theory of particles and fields comments on this in his Nobel acceptance speech.  “Good people can behave well and bad people can do evil:  but for good people to do evil – that takes religion.”  While I will reserve comment on why a particle physicist would venture into the realms of sociology and theology in his Nobel acceptance speech I must say I think he’s on to something we should consider.

1.    Dim

There are those who hold to the Truth while excluding the Light.  I call these people “Joy Stealers.”  They like nothing better than to bludgeon people with the Truth without considering the Light.  Paul’s letter to the Galatians is full of concern for his friends who were being “bewitched” and “enslaved” by just these kinds of people.  Unfortunately such people continue to thrive in our day and age.  There is an old wag I share, tongue-in-cheek, from time to time concerning the “Baptist” view. 

Baptist’s don’t drink,

Baptist’s don’t chew,

And Baptist’s don’t go with girls who do.

(Furthermore, Baptist’s don’t recognize each other in the liquor store.)

We would do well to remember that Jesus was known as “the friend of sinners” and that the “Joy Stealers” of his day did not approve of the company he kept or the parties he attended.  They were purveyors of Truth without the illumination of the Light.  But let us always be cautious with this matter.  As Leonard Sweet perspicaciously observes, “There is no one soul size.  What makes one sing may singe another.” (Leonard Sweet, Soul Salsa)  Or as Paul put it, “Don’t use this freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but serve one another in love.” (Galatians 5:13).  Martin Luther summed it up nicely, “Love God and do as you please.” 

2.    Deadly

In much the same way Light without the guiding hand of Truth became deadly under the Nazi regime during World War II, Truth apart from the illuminating presence of Light has all too often become deadly.  Perhaps the most widely known example of this disturbing phenomenon is the Spanish Inquisition.  Spanning almost four centuries this terrible abuse of Truth in the absence of Light took the lives of thousands of people whose only crime was daring to espouse a belief different from those who ruled over them.  This reign of terror began during the reign of Ferdinand and Isabella (yes, the same ones who would provide Columbus a few boats to make his fateful journey in 1492).  In 1478 they petitioned the Pope for permission to “purify the people of Spain” and soon thereafter began the persecution of Protestants, Jews, and other non-believers.  Thousands were forced from their homes and thousands more lost their lives during this “purification.”  Remarkably this practice continued until 1834.

I wish this was an anomaly or a singularly unique event.  Sadly it is not.  History is replete with stories of the unhappy and deadly marriage of Truth and Power devoid of the illuminating presence of Light.  I pray for a brighter future for the purveyors of Truth.

3.    Deceptive

Truth without the benefit of Light can also lead to deception.  Sometimes people, particularly people of faith, want to close their eyes and not see what the Light may be revealing.  I sometimes tell the story of the pastor who was talking with some children.  “Kids I’m thinking of something that is grey, lives in trees, eats nuts and has a bushy tail.  Can anyone guess what I’m thinking about?”  After a few moments of uncomfortable silence one little boy slowly raised his hand and said, “I know the answer is supposed to be Jesus, but it sure sounds like a squirrel to me!”

Galileo Galieri had an encounter with thinking dominated by Truth without the illumination of Light that was only recently resolved.  Galileo was denounced by the church in 1615 for daring to state that Copernicus was right and that the earth indeed revolved around the sun.  Late in his life Galileo, in the interest of his eternal soul, recanted his statement but it was not until 1992 that the Catholic Church cleared his name, finally affirming the Copernican view of the solar system. 

 

How easily Truth becomes hidebound when it is insulated from the knowledge made available by the pursuit of Light.  How easily Light degenerates into harmful pursuits when not gently guided by the unwavering standard of Truth.  Light and Truth must walk hand in hand.  Lux et Veritas.

III.         Light AND Truth

The world in which we live faces serious questions which require serious answers.  How will we feed the 8 billion people soon to inhabit this planet?  Are all men created equal or are there some who are expendable?  How will we power the future?  How will we address the economic issues facing our world?  I dare say these, and other equally pressing questions, will require the best which Light and Truth have to offer.

Lux et Veritas is a pursuit which must consume our lives.  

However, Lux et Veritas is not a subject to be mastered but rather is the Master to whom we must be subject.  Jesus clearly identifies Himself as the Light and the Truth.  John, in the magnificent opening chapter of his gospel, writes of Jesus saying “in Him was life and that life was the light of men…and we have beheld His glory…full of grace and truth.”  Light and Truth are found only in one, Jesus.

“He is the way.

Follow Him through the Land of Unlikeness

You will see rare beasts and have unique adventures!”

W.H. Auden, For the Time Being.

A Reasonable Faith?

The following probabilities are taken from Peter Stoner in Science Speaks (Moody Press, 1963) to show that coincidence is ruled out by the science of probability.

Stoner states that by using the modern science of probability in reference to eight prophecies, "we find that the chance that any one man might have lived down to the present time and fulfilled all eight prophecies is 1 in 1017."  (Please pardon the format.  Blogger will not support superscript).  That would be 1 in 100,000,000,000,000,000. 

In order to help us comprehend this staggering probability, Stoner illustrates it by supposing that "we take 1017 silver dollars and lay them on the face of Texas.  They will cover the state two feet deep.  "Now mark one of these silver dollars and stir the whole mass thoroughly, all over the state.  Blindfold a man and tell him that he can travel as far as he wishes, but he must pick up one silver dollar and say that this is the right one.  What chance would he have of getting  the right one?  Just the same chance that the prophets would have had of writing these eight prophecies and having them all come true in any one man."

Stoner considers 48 prophecies and says, "we find the chance that any one man fulfilled all 48 prophecies to be 1 in 10157,  that is, 1 in 

100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

The estimated number of electrons in the universe is around 1079.  It should be quite evident that Jesus did not fulfill the prophecies by accident.  

It's not that complicated

“I attain salvation by allowing my spiritual, rather than material, nature to dominate my actions. If I lead a life of spiritual good deeds of compassion, virtue, and self-sacrifice I will enter the kingdom of heaven both in this life and after death.” (Baha’i)


“I save myself by living out my expected dharma of required conduct and by meditation and reciting mantras. I attain salvation only when all my desire is eliminated and I achieve final and ultimate enlightenment.” (Buddhist)


“The goal of my existence is moksha, a freedom from infinite being and selfhood. I work to get out of the cycle of reincarnation. To attain moksha I can choose from several paths: yoga and meditation taught by a guru, the way of works, the way of knowledge, or the way of love and devotion.” (Hindu)


“Only ideas that reflect God’s nature are real, so sin, death, disease, and pain are not real. I attain salvation by overcoming those illusions with a realization of my divine spirit and mind.” (Christian Scientist)


“In order to attain salvation I must have faith, be baptized by immersion, and be actively associated with the Watch Tower and Tract Society. I have no hope of salvation if I fail to display righteous conduct and absolute loyalty to Jehovah.” (Jehovah’s Witness)


“My plan to acquire the celestial kingdom requires that I adhere strictly to the twelve steps of 1. Faith, 2. Repentance, 3. Baptism by immersion into the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 4. Laying on of hands by a member of the Melchizedek priesthood in order to receive the Holy Ghost, 5. Being ordained as a Melchizedek priest, if I am a man, 6. Receiving the temple endowments, 7. Celestial marriage, 8. Observing the Word of Wisdom, 9. Sustaining the prophet, 10. Tithing, 11. Attending the sacred meeting, 12. Obeying the Church, its teachings, and the prophet.” (Mormon)


“I attain salvation by attending church at least once a week, reading my Bible and praying daily, giving 10 percent of my income to the church, and making sure that my good deeds outweigh the bad.” (Average American churchgoer)


Source: www.4truth.net

Thank God for the Bert Elliots of the world.

Ran across this gem on Christianity Today's site. Here's to faint stars that rise night after night to the glory of God.

In January 2006, author Randy Alcorn had the opportunity to join with Jim Elliot's family for a dinner that marked the 50th anniversary of the martyrdom of Jim and four other missionaries in Ecuador. Randy writes:

There we met Jim's older brother, Bert, and his wife Colleen. In 1949, years before Jim went to Ecuador, they became missionaries to Peru. When we discussed their ministry, Bert smiled and said, "I can't wait to get back from furlough." Now in their eighties, they are in their sixtieth year as missionaries, joyfully reaching people for Christ. Until that weekend I didn't know anything about them. Bert and Colleen may enter eternity under the radar of the church at large, but not under God's ….

Bert said something to me that day that I'll never forget: "Jim and I both served Christ, but differently. Jim was a great meteor, streaking through the sky." Bert didn't go on to describe himself, but I will. Unlike his brother Jim, Bert is a faint star that rises night after night, faithfully crossing the same path in the sky to God's glory. I believe Jim Elliot's reward is considerable, but it wouldn't surprise me to discover that Bert and Colleen's will be greater still.

Randy Alcorn, If God Is Good: Faith in the Midst of Suffering and Evil (Multnomah, 2009), p. 421

"Change the Gears Within Us..."

Forgive us, Lord Jesus, for doing the things that make us uncomfortable and guilty when we pray.
We say that we believe in God, and yet we doubt God's promises.
We say that in God we trust, yet we worry and try to manage our own affairs.
We say that we love Thee, O Lord, and yet do not obey Thee.
We believe that Thou hast the answers to all our problems, and yet we do not consult Thee.
Forgive us, Lord, for our lack of faith and the wilful [sic] pride that ignores the way, the truth, and the life.
Wilt Thou reach down and change the gears within us that we may go forward with Thee. AMEN

Peter Marshall, Mr. Jones Meet the Master; Sermons and Prayers, 1950. (emphasis added)

Prominence vs. Significance

prominent - adj - 1. Projecting outward from a line or surface: PROTUBERANT. 2. Immediately noticeable: CONSPICUOUS. 3. Widely known: EMINENT.

significant - adj - 1. Having or expressing a meaning: MEANINGFUL. 2. Having or expressing a covert meaning: SUGGESTIVE. 3. Momentous: IMPORTANT.

Can one be significant without being prominent? This is a question I have grappled with for several years now. The vast majority of us are not, and will never be, "prominent" but I firmly believe we can all be significant. The difference is, I believe, well, significant.

There is much desire for prominence in our culture. Gaining one's fifteen minutes of fame seems to be the life pursuit of many. Some see prominence as equal with significance as is illustrated in the celebrities who find it necessary to comment upon subjects about which they have little or no knowledge. Sadly prominence does not necessarily carry with it the weight of significance.

Significance may go largely unnoticed by the tabloid tititlated public. Significance may pass quietly under the radar of the prominence seekers. Significance rarely seeks prominence preferring the quiet and steady rhythms of meaningful change.

On rare occasions there are those significant individuals who are contentedly carrying out their significant livs that, much to their surprise, become prominent. One thinks of Mother Teresa, or Rosa Parks, or Billy Graham, or Martin Luther of the reformation (Perhaps Dr. King would fit this category though I might argue from his biography he was always seeking prominence), and these are only a few who come to mind quickly.

Can one be significant without being prominent? In my little life there have been many significant people whose names would mean nothing to you, yet for me they are the sources of life and inspiration. Here's to significance! Live it well!